June 2026 Structured Notes Review: The 36 That Passed the Screen

Every month, roughly 150 to 200 new structured notes come to market, and nobody advising clients has time to read them all. This series does the boring work instead. We read the whole calendar, run every note through the same stated criteria, and write down the ones that passed, with the terms and the reasoning attached. You can check every CUSIP against its offering documents. Nothing here is a recommendation; it's a screen with its criteria published, so you can see exactly why each note passed or got cut and apply your own judgment on top. The selection is always yours.

A quick note on how I describe protection, because the offering documents and I count it differently. I state the decline a note protects you against. When I say a note has a "50% barrier," I mean you're protected until the underlying falls more than 50%. Offering docs usually quote that same barrier as a level, so what I call a 40% barrier shows up in the fine print as "60% of the initial level." Bigger number in my framing means more protection, which is the number you actually feel in a bad year.

June 2026 in numbers

June's calendar ran to 150 notes: 45 income, 39 callable, 35 CD, 19 growth, and 12 boost. Thirty-six passed. The full breakdown, with every note's terms and screening notes, lives in the screen results section at the bottom of this page, served straight from our notes database, so it reflects any corrections we make after publication.

Thirty-six out of 150 is a fairly typical pass rate. Most of what gets cut is cut for dull reasons: a coupon a couple of points behind a better peer, a commissioned fee structure, or growth-style leverage bolted onto an engineered index. The 36 below cleared all of that.

Growth

Growth notes give uncapped participation in an index, and they only pay off if that index actually climbs. So this is the one bucket where the screen is strict about the underlying: it has to be a real, broad, un-engineered index. Every pass below sits on the S&P 500 futures index, the Euro Stoxx 50, or an EAFE basket, all of which track live markets. We passed on growth notes carried by decrement and volatility-control indices this month no matter how high the participation rate looked, because those indices are built to grind sideways and won't deliver the upside growth is bought for.

The Barclays note (06749HEN1) has the highest participation of the group at 2.2x on the S&P 500 futures index, uncapped, with a 30% barrier underneath. If you're bullish on US large caps over five years, that's a lot of upside for the risk. The BofA note next to it (09711QTQ6) trades a bit of that participation, 2.05x, for a deeper 40% barrier, which is a fair swap if you want more cushion.

The best-built note here is 09664HYK0, even though its 1.75x is the lowest leverage in the table. It's the only growth note this month with a hard 20% buffer rather than a barrier, and a buffer is worth more than a barrier of the same size because it keeps cushioning all the way down. It also carries a dual-directional feature, so a modest market decline inside the protected zone can pay you a positive return. Lower headline number, better-built note.

The two-year Euro Stoxx note (09711QDY6) is the short, conservative option: 1.25x on a real European index with a 10% buffer, for someone who wants growth exposure without a five-year commitment.

Boost

Boost notes are the short, leveraged, usually capped cousins of growth. The right way to judge them is cap-per-year for the tenor, and this month BofA ran a clean family of 18-month notes at 1.25x with a hard 10% buffer on major single indices, each with a cap that's generous for the holding period.

Don't dismiss the BofA notes for "only 1.25x." Over 18 months, a 27% cap on emerging markets (09711QJW4) or a 26.5% cap on the Russell 2000 (09711QHS5) is roughly 17 to 18% per year of upside room, on a major index, with the first 10% of any loss absorbed by a hard buffer. That's an efficient way to lean into a market for a year and a half with a real cushion. The Nasdaq and S&P versions offer smaller caps because those indices are less volatile, which is the trade you'd expect.

JP Morgan's 15-month note (46661AKQ2) takes a different shape: 2x participation on the S&P 500 with an 11.25% cap and the same 10% buffer. The higher leverage means you hit the cap faster, so it suits a view that the market rises modestly rather than rockets.

The Bitcoin note (46661ALR9) is the outlier and the one to approach with clear eyes. IBIT is a Bitcoin ETF, so the underlying is far riskier than an equity index. The terms are excellent for what they are: 1.5x participation with a near-uncapped 158% ceiling and a 30% barrier. If you already want measured crypto exposure, the structure is well-built. If you don't, no cap or barrier makes Bitcoin behave like the S&P.

Income

Income notes pay a coupon as long as the underlying holds above a level. Here, unlike growth, an engineered index is often the right tool, because the note only needs the index to stay flat or mildly down for the coupons to keep coming, and the decrement and MerQube indices tend to grind out exactly that kind of steady, low-drama path while carrying the best coupons on the calendar. What we watch on these is the pairing of coupon size and trigger. A high coupon behind a forgiving barrier is the good version.

The three-year BNP note (05619JP79) leads with an 18.5% annualized coupon paid monthly. Its trigger is more demanding, since the index has to stay within 30% of its start for the coupon to pay, but on a decrement index that grinds along steadily, an 18.5% coupon is high enough to justify that tighter level. That trade passes. The same 30%-decline trigger behind a middling coupon does not, which is why several notes with ordinary coupons behind demanding barriers got cut.

At the other end, 09664HYZ7 pays a more modest 12.2% but only stops paying if the index falls more than 50%, which is a lot of room. That one is for a conservative income investor who wants the coupons to keep coming through a serious downturn and will accept a smaller number for the comfort. The middle of the table, the 14 to 17% notes with 40 to 50% protection, is where most income buyers will find the balance they want.

Worth noting what's absent: no single-stock income notes made the cut this month. A single company can crater and never recover in a way a broad index rarely does, so single-stock income only passes when the coupon is exceptional, and nothing in June cleared that bar.

Callable

Callable notes pay a premium and can end early, usually through an autocall that returns your money and pays the accrued premium when the index is at or above a set level. The appeal is a large premium that pays even in a flat market. The deep-barrier snowballs on decrement and MerQube indices are the core of this month's list.

The top three are the workhorses: annualized snowball premiums of 26.5 to 29.25% on leveraged indices, each protected unless the underlying falls more than 50%. Those pay their premium and call whenever the index is merely flat, and a 50% barrier is a lot of downside room. All three are autocalls, triggered by a rule rather than the bank's discretion, which is the kind of call the screen favors.

The two short digital notes (06376L5S1 and 06749HEX9) work differently and fill a useful niche. Each pays a fixed sum, 20.3% or 15%, as long as the Nasdaq-100, Russell 2000, and S&P 500 all stay within 30% of their starting levels. They use three indices at once, which the screen normally penalizes, but the short tenor and a payout that survives a moderately down market outweigh the multi-index penalty. These are hedged-return notes for someone who thinks the market chops sideways or drifts down a little.

The Mag-7 basket notes (09664KPY3 and 09664KPX5) and the crypto note (46661ALU2) are the higher-risk end. The basket notes pay a large one-time autocall premium, 43.15% or 36.8%, and if they don't call, you keep 3x participation behind a 50% or 40% barrier. The Ethereum note pays 35% with 1.5x behind a 40% barrier. Good structures on volatile underlyings, appropriate only if you want that exposure.

CD

CD-style notes return 100% of your principal at maturity and give you upside on top. Because the principal is protected, features that would worry us on an unprotected note become acceptable here. An issuer or snowball call, for example, can only forgo future upside, not touch your money, so we're happy to see it on a CD.

The most eye-catching is BNP's 6x uncapped note on its Multi-Asset index (09664HXW5). Six times participation with your principal guaranteed sounds too good until you remember the index is a mild, diversified one that won't move like the S&P. The CD wrapper is what makes that acceptable: you can own an otherwise unremarkable index precisely because the downside is removed, and the 6x means even a modest rise turns into a real return. The three-year version at 3.54x (09664HXU9) is the same idea over a shorter hold.

If you want protection on the actual S&P 500, 09664HXK1 caps you at 41.5% over five years with full principal protection, which is the highest cap on the real index this month. Two snowball CDs stand out for flat-market income: 09664HY95 pays an 18% annualized snowball and 09664HY87 pays a 75.5% digital if the index is at or above its start at year five, both fully protected, so you can earn a strong return in a flat market with no risk to principal. The Morgan Stanley SPXFP note (61781GBL4) pairs a 16.5% snowball with a 1.6x uncapped backup if it doesn't call, and its issuer call is fine here for the reason above: on a CD it only forgoes upside.

The criteria

None of this is mechanical, but the filters are consistent, and they're stated plainly so you can apply them, argue with them, or tighten them for your own book.

We only look at fee-based notes and drop anything commissioned, because a sales commission is a drag on the client's return that exists to reward distribution. Given a choice, we take a buffer over a barrier of the same size, since a buffer keeps cushioning all the way down. For growth notes we insist on a real, broad index and reject engineered ones outright, while for income, callable, and CD notes we're happy with decrement and strategy indices because those structures only need the index flat and those indices carry the best terms. We judge every note against its peers in the same month rather than in isolation, and when two are similar we keep the dominant one and drop the other. And we lean against issuer calls on unprotected notes, while accepting them on principal-protected CDs where a call can't cost you anything but upside.

Run June's calendar through those filters and you get the 36 in the screen results section below, with each note's terms and our one-line reasoning. Next month we'll do it again.

This screen is impersonal research for financial professionals and education only. It is not investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security, and a note passing the screen means it met our stated criteria, not that it suits any client. Every note listed carries the credit risk of its issuing bank and is not FDIC insured, except for genuine market-linked CDs. Terms are summarized from the June 2026 calendar and may change; confirm all details in each note's official offering documents before acting on anything here.